Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Bouley results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 608 hits . Analysis detected 4,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,841 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,239 of 6,348 authors). This Ken Bouley is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Ken Bouley
Author details
Total words: 2,841
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.4% 21.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst