Author summary
98%1 analyzed article/video947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Bouley results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 608 hits. Analysis detected 4,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,841 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,239 of 6,348 authors). This Ken Bouley is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Ken Bouley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
81%Ken Bouley (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,841
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.4%21.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos