Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith O'Brien results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 761 hits . Analysis detected 5,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,437 of 6,628 authors). This Keith O'Brien is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Keith O'Brien
Author details
Total words: 4,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.1% 16.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 13.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst