Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kate Wagner results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 3,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,887 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kate Wagner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kate Wagner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Kate Wagner (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,887
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos