Author summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Park results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 2,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (2,707 of 6,454 authors). This Kate Park is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Kate Park
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠59%Kate Park (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos