Author summary
85%1 analyzed article/video846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katarina Hall results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 715 hits. Analysis detected 2,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,538 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,862 of 6,498 authors). This Katarina Hall is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Katarina Hall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
72%Katarina Hall (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,538
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.2%28.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos