Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Hao results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 1,707 hits. Analysis detected 11,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (988 of 6,362 authors). This Karen Hao is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Karen Hao
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠85%Karen Hao (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,848
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 14.4%14.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.6%11.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos