Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KAITLYN HUAMANI AP technology writer results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 1,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,295 of 6,628 authors). This KAITLYN HUAMANI AP technology writer is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
KAITLYN HUAMANI AP technology writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
36%KAITLYN HUAMANI AP technology writer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,696
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.4%2.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos