Author summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kainoa Lowman results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,734 hits . Analysis detected 13,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,202 of 6,628 authors). This Kainoa Lowman is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Kainoa Lowman
Author details
Total words: 15,736
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst