Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Hammer results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 1,030 hits . Analysis detected 6,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,293 of 6,135 authors). This Josh Hammer is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Josh Hammer
Author details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.1% 29.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 19.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst