Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Serna results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,112 of 6,244 authors). This Joseph Serna is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Joseph Serna
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%Joseph Serna (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,389
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.7%9.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos