Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge Garay results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 4,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,201 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,299 of 6,628 authors). This Jorge Garay is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Jorge Garay
Author details
Total words: 6,201
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst