Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Capehart results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Recency Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 342 hits . Analysis detected 2,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (1,942 of 6,628 authors). This Jonathan Capehart is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Jonathan Capehart
Author details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst