Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jon Decker results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 177 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Jon Decker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jon Decker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Jon Decker (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 177
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles177 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 26.0%26.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos