Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John M. Pierce results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Slippery Slope , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.3% saturation with 1,173 hits . Analysis detected 7,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,334 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 95% (321 of 6,318 authors). This John M. Pierce is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. John M. Pierce
Author details
Total words: 2,334
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 50.3% 50.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 28.9% 28.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 36.0% 36.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 26.2% 26.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 22.1% 22.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.3% 19.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.2% 8.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.2% 8.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Author 50.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 36.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 30.9%, sitewide 26.9% Slippery Slope: Author 28.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 26.2%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst