Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Laurenson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 2,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,559 of 6,628 authors). This John Laurenson is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. John Laurenson
Author details
Total words: 6,160
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst