Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JIM MORRIS results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,421 of 6,605 authors). This JIM MORRIS is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
JIM MORRIS
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠79%JIM MORRIS (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,736
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.8%16.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 14.5%14.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.1%2.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos