Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Anderson results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 238 hits . Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,647 of 6,303 authors). This Jim Anderson is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Jim Anderson
Author details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst