Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Nehrer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 392 hits . Analysis detected 2,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,581 of 6,628 authors). This Jennifer Nehrer is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Jennifer Nehrer
Author details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst