Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jeff Rueter results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 4,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,347 authors). This Jeff Rueter is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jeff Rueter
Author details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.6% 23.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst