Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeannie DeAngelis results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 2,449 hits. Analysis detected 10,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (676 of 6,172 authors). This Jeannie DeAngelis is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Jeannie DeAngelis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠90%Jeannie DeAngelis (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,065
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 60.3%60.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 27.6%27.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 27.3%27.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.8%13.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 60.3%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Author 27.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Author 27.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos