Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Proctor results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,461 of 6,467 authors). This Jason Proctor is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Jason Proctor
Author details
Total words: 4,852
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst