Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Janet Murray results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 526 hits . Analysis detected 3,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,391 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Janet Murray is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Janet Murray
Author details
Total words: 2,391
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.0% 22.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst