Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jana Rose Schleis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 375 hits . Analysis detected 3,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,281 of 6,628 authors). This Jana Rose Schleis is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Jana Rose Schleis
Author details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.3% 7.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst