Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Desborough results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 3,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,367 of 6,628 authors). This James Desborough is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
James Desborough
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠65%James Desborough (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,744
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.9%6.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos