Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Wallis Simons results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 1,159 hits . Analysis detected 7,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (558 of 6,595 authors). This Jake Wallis Simons is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Jake Wallis Simons
Author details
Total words: 2,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 46.9% 46.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 22.9% 22.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 25.4% 25.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.3% 15.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 25.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 22.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst