Author summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaden Edison results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (5,044 of 6,561 authors). This Jaden Edison is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Jaden Edison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠24%Jaden Edison (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,417
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos