Author summary
6%1 analyzed article/video578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Slemenda results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Indoctrination, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,734 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,711 of 6,628 authors). This Jack Slemenda is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Jack Slemenda
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
29%Jack Slemenda (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,734
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos