Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Seale results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 1,333 hits . Analysis detected 6,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,100 of 6,628 authors). This Jack Seale is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Jack Seale
Author details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.4% 36.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.5% 31.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 31.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst