Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J.C. Polanco results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 572 hits . Analysis detected 3,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 90% (725 of 6,629 authors). This J.C. Polanco is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. J.C. Polanco
Author details
Total words: 1,806
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.1% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.4% 22.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 13.9% 13.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.7% 31.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 31.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 13.9%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst