Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Itzel Luna results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 2,068 hits . Analysis detected 13,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,135 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,895 of 6,246 authors). This Itzel Luna is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Itzel Luna
Author details
Total words: 13,135
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst