Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabelle Gallant results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 587 hits . Analysis detected 3,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,059 of 6,628 authors). This Isabelle Gallant is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Isabelle Gallant
Author details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst