Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HYUNG-JIN KIM results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 123 hits . Analysis detected 674 faulty-reasoning hits from 906 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,004 of 6,628 authors). This HYUNG-JIN KIM is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. HYUNG-JIN KIM
Author details
Total words: 906
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles906 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.6% 13.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst