Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HYUNG-JIN KIM results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 674 faulty-reasoning hits from 906 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,004 of 6,628 authors). This HYUNG-JIN KIM is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
HYUNG-JIN KIM
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
85%HYUNG-JIN KIM (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 906
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles906 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.6%13.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.5%7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos