Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Montgomery results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.9% saturation with 3,489 hits . Analysis detected 10,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,349 of 6,628 authors). This Hugh Montgomery is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Hugh Montgomery
Author details
Total words: 7,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 48.9% 48.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 28.1% 28.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 48.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 28.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst