Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hina Alam results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 242 hits . Analysis detected 1,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,099 of 6,628 authors). This Hina Alam is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Hina Alam
Author details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst