Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazel Cills results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,204 hits . Analysis detected 4,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,312 of 6,365 authors). This Hazel Cills is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Hazel Cills
Author details
Total words: 9,232
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst