Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haydn Watters results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,830 of 6,628 authors). This Haydn Watters is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Haydn Watters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
12%Haydn Watters (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos