Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Yang results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 604 hits . Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,881 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (575 of 6,164 authors). This Hannah Yang is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Hannah Yang
Author details
Total words: 1,881
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.7% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 32.1% 32.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 28.1% 28.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 28.1%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst