Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Yang results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 604 hits. Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,881 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (575 of 6,164 authors). This Hannah Yang is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Hannah Yang
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Hannah Yang (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,881
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 32.1%32.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 28.1%28.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 28.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos