Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hannah Rae Armstrong results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 2,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Hannah Rae Armstrong is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hannah Rae Armstrong
Author details
Total words: 4,636
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst