Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Holland results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 863 hits. Analysis detected 6,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (1,864 of 6,357 authors). This Hannah Holland is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Hannah Holland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠71%Hannah Holland (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,984
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.3%17.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos