Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hal Brands results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 785 hits . Analysis detected 3,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,350 authors). This Hal Brands is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hal Brands
Author details
Total words: 9,438
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst