Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Kessler results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 1,211 hits. Analysis detected 8,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (492 of 6,269 authors). This Glenn Kessler is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Glenn Kessler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
93%Glenn Kessler (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,884
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510092.2% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 42.0%42.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.1%18.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 20.0%20.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 20.5%20.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.6%15.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.9%18.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 20.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 20.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 18.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos