Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gerrit De Vynck results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 641 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (389 of 6,359 authors). This Gerrit De Vynck is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Gerrit De Vynck
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠94%Gerrit De Vynck (selected)10%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 641
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
9.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles641 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.9%27.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.7%18.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 11.7%11.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 9.8%9.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 24.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 18.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos