Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These George P. Brooks results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 2,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,410 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This George P. Brooks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
George P. Brooks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%George P. Brooks (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,410
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 13.6%13.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 13.4%13.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 31.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 13.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos