Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geoffery-Clark results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 2,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,373 of 6,244 authors). This Geoffery-Clark is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Geoffery-Clark
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
78%Geoffery-Clark (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510078.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Circular Reasoning: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos