Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geoff Nixon results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 743 hits. Analysis detected 3,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,594 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,091 of 6,628 authors). This Geoff Nixon is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Geoff Nixon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
69%Geoff Nixon (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,594
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos