Author summary
16%1 analyzed article/video144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gemma DiCarlo results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 178 faulty-reasoning hits from 432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (640 of 6,162 authors). This Gemma DiCarlo is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Gemma DiCarlo
Author details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed authors
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles432 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often