Author summary
â 92% 1 analyzed article/video 738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gayla Cawley results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 2,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,214 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of â 80% (1,353 of 6,628 authors). This Gayla Cawley is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Gayla Cawley
Author details
Total words: 2,214
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.4% 23.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.3% 22.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Primacy Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst