Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,470 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Kim results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 2,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,410 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,126 of 6,628 authors). This Garrett Kim is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Garrett Kim
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
68%Garrett Kim (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,410
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos