Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriella Lacey results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 707 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,461 of 6,364 authors). This Gabriella Lacey is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Gabriella Lacey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
78%Gabriella Lacey (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,044
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.7%7.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos