Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fred Schulte results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 1,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,201 of 6,628 authors). This Fred Schulte is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Fred Schulte
Author details
Total words: 4,040
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Tu Quoque: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Middle Ground: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst